Pssst. Quebec putting a ban on public prayer

Shhhh Keep this quiet. 

I wasn't sure I heard it correctly. It almost snuck past me. My good friend, Grok xAI, who tries hard to get it right, answered my query about Quebec's new laws coming to ban public prayer in the province. 

This the Quebec government did on the slowest news day they could find, Aug. 29, 2025, the day before the nationwide Labour Day long weekend. Pretty much buried it as deep in the news cycle as it could possibly go. I bet they didn't even read the news release on CBC, English and French. The bar was open at noon on Friday. And it's an Open Bar funded by free American booze and Canadian taxpayer green slush something or other. What Am I? A reporter?

Here it is from Grok:

On August 29, 2025, Quebec’s Secularism Minister Jean-François Roberge announced plans to table a bill banning prayer in public spaces, aiming to reinforce the province’s secularism policies. The move, part of the Coalition Avenir Québec (CAQ) government’s broader push for laïcité, follows Premier François Legault’s December 2024 comments expressing discomfort with public prayers, particularly Muslim prayers during pro-Palestinian demonstrations in Montreal, such as those outside the Notre-Dame Basilica. Roberge called the “proliferation of street prayer” a “serious and sensitive issue” but provided no specific details on how the ban would be enforced or which spaces and faiths would be affected. The announcement has sparked significant controversy. Civil rights groups, including the Canadian Civil Liberties Association and the National Council of Canadian Muslims, condemned it as an infringement on religious freedom and expression, arguing it disproportionately targets Muslim communities. Quebec’s Catholic bishops also raised concerns, noting potential disruptions to rituals like the Good Friday procession. Legal experts suggest the ban could rely on the notwithstanding clause to override Charter protections, as Quebec did with Bill 21, which bans religious symbols for certain public employees. An advisory committee’s recent report, which influenced the decision, recommended leaving public prayer regulation to municipalities, not a province-wide ban, highlighting a divergence from the government’s approach. Critics, including former senator André Pratte, accuse the CAQ of exploiting anti-Muslim sentiment for political gain amid declining poll numbers.[](https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/public-prayer-ban-quebec-1.7619985) (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/aug/29/quebec-public-prayer-ban) (https://globalnews.ca/news/11354604/quebec-public-prayer-ban-constitution/)

Canada's Province of Quebec is banning the practice of praying in public. Is this a surprise? Quelle surprise? Quebec has been pushing back on 'religious' trappings related to coverings. The authorities have been taking the religious publicity seriously since incendiary riotous actions by Islamists in Montreal and elsewhere in Quebec have become over threats to public safety. People might not understand the people of Quebec have always been conservative in terms of religion, at least up to the end of the 1960s, Quebec was broadly understood to be a state as Catholic as any in the world. If there was going to be a North American Pope, he would be coming from Quebec. Quebec ranks up there with Poland for Conservative Catholicism. They've had a few priests in the running for Pope over the years. Poland has shown zero tolerance for Islamist actions, interventions, or idiots, breaking in seeking needless and fake asylum. And I believe it is obvious Quebec is moving swiftly to assume a position similar to Poland regarding a rise of Islam in public displays. In Canada, Quebec as a province has extended provincial authority or else a Constitutional sidestep called the Notwithstanding Clause to successfully put this no public prayer law in Quebec.

@ABDanielleSmith

"What the fuck did I ever do to Allah?"

 He seems nice. . . . Oh. Shit. I am never voting Liberal again.

 

Salute the Flag (so happens to be the Jolly Roger)

First this:

To which I reply,

This must be the 'globalist' strategy, "to make nations perish from the Earth." In order for a globalist multi-faceted agenda to take hold, they need nations to perish from the earth. 

This structure of order disappearing will expose people to a different level of governance, which is the 'globalist' agenda inclusive of so many different things. (Think of something terrifying. It's on their agenda.)

You see, people like Keir Starmer aren't content with ruling Britain. They know they can rule the world if they can, "get the nations out of the way." 

Same with Canada's Mark Carney. If he can get rid of Canada he can rule a much greater entity known as the world. 

This has to be the globalist small-L liberal agenda world-wide, attaining the  disintegration of nation after nation achieved by installing guys in governments to dismantle nations.

Now, of course, these are ya know, psychopaths, so they're not going to give up anything resembling control, or power, unless they are obtaining an extraordinary abundance of control and power in return, quid pro quo, at minimum, in their estimation.

This happens. Make no mistake. It happens on the promise to these puppets of the premise that a globalist agenda plundering the whole world requires a few rulers to do the deeds.

They don't lose a nation, they gain a whole world to abuse, and rule and plunder!

To be clear, this isn't legitimate human conduct. Oh. No. It's way over the top in to the realm of criminal human conduct. 

It is selfish, greedy, punitive, infantile, petty, burning down society, harming family, torching resources, absconding with every speck of wealth, and denying  any opportunity to everyone. It's criminal in full regalia. 

That's what Keir Starmer is. That's what Mark Carney is. There's also who they work for, more criminals. They don't obey laws, because they be the law. That's why nations need to go. Nations have trappings, like courts, and occasionally honest people running them, putting criminals in prison.

When they trash a nation, they drag the booty to the table in the world. And they rule from there, while the people in the nation are robbed and plundered by this crazy criminal cabal of nationless pirates. Suppose it's actually nothing new. MIGHT AS WELL FLY IT.

If it's going wrong, it had to start somewhere

Could this be it?

Make Canada Christian again?

No absolutely let him sell his wares and sing his songs and preach, in some form of social decorum, perhaps a rented facility, and the proselytizing under wraps, of course the social life of Christianity is a part of Canadian life. It has always been, but the observances are personal and private and distinguished from governance. I don't believe a Legislature, for example, is the ideal venue for Christian hoopla, or any hoopla. And the organizers don't grasp how nefarious it is to make public facilities religious battlefields. Then it's time to shut it down the leave the building.

I mean. How would you like it if the Church of Satan took over the Legislature and started playing whatever music and singing whatever songs the Satanists sing? And follow that with, I don't know, how about a year long sit-in by Tibetan Monks who chant in gratitude for Alberta LNG?

Now people go around thinking it's the Government restricting the use of religion in the making of laws in countries like Canada, and the U.S., and UK, etcetera. It's not the governments at all putting up the prohibition. It's the Bible. "Give unto God that which is God's and Give unto Caesar that which is Caesar's." Right there, instruction manual for civilizations says, what God demands is completely separate from what human authority demands.

And they do not actually meet. Strange. Human beings are instructed to run on instinct.

Give unto God, that which is God's. Which is basically nothing. And Give unto Caesar that which is Caesar's, which is basically everything. So. Instinct.

Now interestingly, government will invoke religion to make war. And men follow instinct to conduct war because some of the men say God is telling them to.

Hey Grok, was the Suez Canal a big deal?

Was the Suez Canal a big deal?

Yes, the Suez Canal was and still is a big deal. Opened in 1869, it’s a 120-mile artificial waterway connecting the Mediterranean Sea to the Red Sea, slashing travel time between Europe and Asia by avoiding the lengthy route around Africa’s southern tip.



It handles about 12% of global trade, with over 1 billion tons of cargo passing through annually in recent years.

Its strategic importance made it a focal point in conflicts like the 1956 Suez Crisis, and blockages, like the 2021 Ever Given incident, disrupt global supply chains, costing billions.

Geopolitically, it’s a chokepoint, influencing trade, energy flows, and military strategy. Egypt’s economy heavily relies on canal revenues, around $9 billion annually. So, yeah, it’s kind of a linchpin.

Ever Given?

The Ever Given is a massive container ship, one of the largest in the world, operated by the Taiwanese company Evergreen Marine. In March 2021, it became infamous for getting stuck sideways in the Suez Canal for six days, blocking the critical trade route. The 400-meter-long ship, carrying about 18,300 containers, was caught by high winds and a sandstorm, wedging itself diagonally across the canal. This halted roughly $9-10 billion in daily trade, stranding over 400 ships and spiking global shipping costs. The blockage exposed the fragility of global supply chains, delaying goods like electronics, oil, and consumer products. Egyptian authorities and salvage teams eventually freed it using tugboats, dredgers, and high tides, but the incident led to weeks of logistical chaos. Compensation disputes between Egypt and the ship’s owners dragged on, with Egypt initially demanding $916 million for losses. The Ever Given’s mishap remains a textbook case of how one ship can mess up the world’s economy.

Why didn't I hear more about this? Covid?

The Ever Given incident, which blocked the Suez Canal for six days in March 2021, did get significant media coverage at the time, but it’s plausible you didn’t hear as much about it due to the overwhelming dominance of COVID-19 in the news cycle.

 Here’s why: COVID-19 Overshadowed Everything: In early 2021, the world was deep in the pandemic’s grip. News was saturated with stories about vaccine rollouts, new variants (like Delta), lockdowns, and rising death tolls. The global focus was on health crises, economic fallout, and social restrictions, which likely drowned out other stories. The Ever Given incident, while disruptive, was a temporary event that didn’t directly affect most people’s daily lives the way COVID did.

Scale of Impact vs. Public Attention: The Suez blockage caused massive economic ripples—delaying $9-10 billion in daily trade and spiking shipping costs—but its effects were mostly felt in industries like logistics, retail, and manufacturing. For the average person, the impact (like delayed goods or price hikes) wasn’t immediately obvious, unlike COVID’s direct hit on health, jobs, and social life. News outlets prioritize stories with immediate, relatable consequences, so the canal story faded faster.

Short Duration: The blockage lasted only six days (March 23-29, 2021). Once the ship was freed, the story’s urgency dropped, and coverage shifted to the resolution and memes (like the tiny excavator next to the giant ship). COVID, by contrast, was a multi-year crisis with endless developments, keeping it front and center.

Media Fatigue and Focus: By 2021, people were experiencing news fatigue from the relentless COVID coverage. A complex story about global trade logistics might not have grabbed attention compared to more emotionally charged pandemic updates. Plus, the Suez story lacked a human toll or ongoing drama to sustain long-term coverage.

Geographic Disconnect: If you’re not in a region heavily reliant on Suez Canal trade (like Europe, Asia, or the Middle East), the story might’ve felt distant. In contrast, COVID was universal, affecting everyone directly.

The Ever Given saga did spark some viral moments on platforms like X, with memes and jokes about the stuck ship, but these were fleeting compared to the pandemic’s grip on public discourse. If you were tuned into COVID-related news or avoiding news overload, it’s easy to see how the Suez story slipped under your radar.

Hey Grok? Does Israel play a role in the security of the Suez Canal?

Israel plays a significant role in the security dynamics of the Suez Canal, primarily due to its strategic location and military capabilities, though it does not directly control or secure the canal itself. The Suez Canal, located in Egypt, is a critical global trade route, and its security is primarily managed by Egypt. However, Israel’s proximity and geopolitical influence in the region contribute to the broader security environment. 

### Key Points: 

1. **Geopolitical Influence**: Israel’s location near the Suez Canal, particularly its control over the Sinai Peninsula until 1979 (returned to Egypt via the Camp David Accords), and its current borders near the canal, make it a significant regional player. Its military presence and intelligence capabilities help deter threats that could destabilize the region, indirectly supporting canal security. 

2. **Regional Stability**: Israel’s conflicts and alliances impact the Middle East’s stability, which affects the Suez Canal. For instance, tensions with groups like Hezbollah or Iran-backed militias could lead to regional disruptions, potentially threatening maritime routes. Israel’s military actions against such groups help maintain a balance of power that indirectly secures critical infrastructure like the canal. 

3. **Naval and Intelligence Operations**: Israel’s navy operates in the Mediterranean and Red Seas, near the canal’s northern and southern entrances. Its intelligence-sharing with Egypt and other allies, including the U.S., enhances monitoring of threats like terrorism or piracy that could target the canal. 

4. **Egypt-Israel Cooperation**: Since the 1979 peace treaty, Israel and Egypt have maintained a cooperative relationship, including security coordination in the Sinai Peninsula, where threats like ISIS-affiliated groups have emerged. This collaboration helps Egypt focus on securing the canal by addressing shared threats. 

5. **Historical Context**: During the 1967 Six-Day War, Israel’s occupation of the Sinai Peninsula led to the canal’s closure until 1975. While Israel no longer controls the area, its historical involvement underscores its strategic interest in the canal’s stability. 

### Limitations: - **Egypt’s Primary Role**: Egypt is solely responsible for the canal’s direct security, with its armed forces and Suez Canal Authority managing operations and protection. - **Indirect Influence**: Israel’s role is secondary, focusing on broader regional security rather than direct canal operations. 

https://x.com/i/grok/share/EvWE5vz38tzJXA2pNWWVY8Yjt

Indian Act passed in 1886 by Liberal government of Alexander Mackenzie

 There are 122 sections, and insults, theft, and imprisonment begins at the beginning . . . .  "Section 2 (1) (Definitions) In this Act, "band" means a body of Indians (a) for whose use and benefit in common, lands, the legal title to which is .  .  . . " under the aegis not of the First Nation people).

      

"The Indian Act seems out of step with the bulk of Canadian law. It singles out a segment of society -- largely on the basis of race -- removes much of their land and property from the commercial mainstream and gives the Minister of Indian & Northern Affairs, and other government officials, a degree of discretion that is not only intrusive but frequently offensive," says Bill Henderson.

     

Henderson says, the IA, "removes much of their land and property from the commercial mainstream" and this is very important, because how many Canadians realize that 60 percent or more of Canadian law is commercial law? Therefore, First Nations people have NO access to 60 to 70 percent of the law of Canada! It seems to me that when a group has no access to legal recourse, they are deprived the rights enjoyed by the rest of the population.

SEE MORE

 Bill Henderson`s Annotated Indian Act 

HERE  

 http://www.bloorstreet.com/200block/sindact.htm

The agriculture of farmed salmon

 The agriculture of salmon delivers pathogen-free, genetically-consistent farm animals produced on a scientific basis, as food safe as you get from any farms in the world. 

As a matter of fact, the science of agriculture is humanity's first science, after first aid, one presumes. It would be humanity's move toward civilization. 

The agriculture of fish is no less of a move toward living in civilization than agriculture of wheat, or canola. This is a move toward food security and better health, considering the scientific standards applied to the production of these animals.

If there wasn't a hidden agenda, somewhere, this reality would not be in dispute.

How much more destruction of the ocean environment results from overfishing? Entire ecosystems will collapse if humanity over fishes the oceans.

In relation to the true nature of issues, the world's environment as impacted by agriculture is nothing compared to the plunder of resources.

The reason the salmon in pens are any issue whatsoever, is, honestly the politicians who govern Canada in a manner that says, "We know something you don't," when they don't listen to the science, the market, the labor force, and the people in communities where industry wants to invest.

They govern Canada like it's a lost cause, in so many ways, including this issue with the agriculture of salmon on the longest coast in the world. As long as Canadians allow political parties to govern this way, it's going to feel like a lost cause, and turn into a lost cause. And there is no reason on Earth for this to be the case. And no reason why Canadians in British Columbia, including Indigenous Canadians, cannot continue to farm salmon for millions of consumers.

The first discovery Cook made on Vancouver Island was slavery

. . . there is no evidence of cannibalism

That's right, Canada. You say you were never a slave nation. You're a liar.  You were an active slave nation well into the 1900s. That's a fact.

This is what set me on course to square the facts.  I object to calling the arrival of Europeans in North America an act of 'colonial dispossession.' when the act of arriving turned into saving a lot of people from their worst nightmare. The facts don't exactly agree with the existing narrative. 

Aren't Indigenous freed from a form of entrapment? Shouldn't there be a celebration or at least a sense of gratitude for the changes wrought by newcomers? After all, there is only so much to celebrate about being Indigenous before Europeans arrived.

A completely overlooked fact was what Captain James Cook discovered when he landed in Nuu Chah Nulth Nation on the west side of present day Vancouver Island, Canada, which he did in 1778. 

 (It's ironic that Cook would next discover cannibalism when he was eaten in Hawaii, not all of him, just the parts the Hawaiians removed. I grant you there are revisionists disputing whether the purloined parts were eaten.)

Cook discovered slavery in the land to become known as Canada. Hard core slave economics were underway across the entirety of North America, formidably underway, and I say this because I hear a lot about how dreadful colonizers were to form Canada  and one presumes their descendants are equally wretched. 

Now of descendants of Indigenous people, we hear a different story, the modern narrative ignores the wretchedness of slavery. Today we hear the coastal nations were hapless victims of a heartless juggernaut rolling over and stopping them in their tracks. 

Stopping them from conducting slavery.

The reality is the British didn't get around to banning slavery until 1833, building up to the ban starting in 1807: "Great Britain banned the slave trade in 1807 with the Slave Trade Act, which prohibited the buying and selling of slaves within the British Empire. Slavery itself was abolished in most of the British Empire with the Slavery Abolition Act of 1833, which came into effect on August 1, 1834. This act freed enslaved people in the colonies, with some exceptions like Ceylon and India, where slavery continued until later. Full emancipation, including transitional arrangements, was completed by 1838 for most territories."

I wrote to the historian, as a response on X:

Hi, Historian! and this was what I said:

Do you have a copy of the Indigenous constitution, Historian, declaring which tribes make the best slaves? How long are slaves supposed to be enslaved before they are executed in the territories under the slave masters authority? Any idea of the menu this week in the Big House? Are we cooking neighboring tribes? Or are we settling for leftovers?

The fact is, the Potlatch was eventually outlawed on the west coast because they learned the purpose of this cadastre of art, imagery, and boundary was to record, and a keep record of accounting for the slave-based economy, therefore burning the art, the paintings, the masks, the carvings, the totem poles meant freeing vassals from bondage.

The design and contents of the drumming, dancing, whistling, snotting, singing (chanting) pointed to who was a slave. The potlatch, with masks, and totems, and welcome poles, and imagery in all pointed to the slave trade, which composed up to 40 percent of a village in some cases, and was a major part of the economy on the west coast from Alaska to Oregon, recorded details of ownership in the Potlatch and Hamatsa artist renderings, which made a legal statement everywhere they went in this civilization. 

Hamatsa society, the Cannibal Society as it is sometimes called, kept the slave economy functioning. It was their surveillance and authority keeping this economy alive, in a sense, they were a functional equivalent to lawyers under the Magna Carta, and it was Hamatsa recordings in these images, which, to repeat, they composed as the artifice, statements of the cadastre, the legal binding of what kept  slaves in place and doing what they were told.

In fact, this slavery was a functional system until  the 1900's, some of it operating in secret. But by then the decimation of population by disease had radically altered the demographics of these nations. 

Needless to say, without intervention, without British law changing for everyone in the British Empire, the slave economy would still be conducted in B.C., obviously, as slavery was the main economic tenet of their lawfully derived society.

Perhaps, in some instances, after a small-pox epidemic swept through a valley or a bayside on this serpentine coastline, the only ones left standing were slaves. I presume this was a liberation if ever there was one. Who knows?

Here's a conclusion drawn by Grok xAI:  The evidence for slavery in the Northwest Coast Potlatch economy is robust, extending beyond anecdotal accounts to include ethnographic studies, historical records, and archaeological inferences. Scholars like Leland Donald provide detailed analyses, supported by primary sources such as fur traders’ journals and Indigenous oral histories, showing that slaves were integral to labor, exchange, and ritual within the potlatch system. While the practice was complex and varied by tribe, it was a key component of the region’s pre-colonial economy and social structure, with slavery’s decline tied to colonial interventions and demographic collapse.

There is no evidence of cannibalism.

What's at stake with these incapacitated Liberals at the helm?

 

Huh? What a headline in Winnipeg!

I don't know why Canada's best-interests were swept into the dustbin in the "first 100 days" of a popular U.S. President. It seems idiotic to see Canada's best game (international trade) and the resources behind it lost to a novice negotiator in Prime Minister Mark Carney.

Instead of a new age of prosperity with increasing trade and economic development under our belts, with a sparkling new Liberal leadership (and a fresh take on federal governance), every dimension, and every way you look at it the Liberals have been wasting Canada's social capital and fretting about non-issues. Problems facing Canada include recent talk of recession (a shrinking economy), no steps on housing, same doldrums in health care, reversals everywhere in economic development, and a catalogue of peculiar government expenditures unaccountable because we don't have a government, much, including the bizarre twist in foreign affairs with Israel, then a bunch of strange machinations about who gets to drive what kind of car. And talk about picking fights you can never win. How about Canada challenging the U.S. to a trade war?

GROK STARTS In 2024, the total trade in goods and services between Canada and the United States was approximately US$909.1 billion. U.S. goods exports to Canada were US$349.9 billion, while imports from Canada were US$411.9 billion, resulting in a goods trade deficit for the U.S. of about US$62 billion. Services trade saw U.S. exports to Canada at US$90.3 billion and imports at US$57.0 billion, yielding a U.S. services trade surplus of US$33.2 billion. When combining goods and services, the overall U.S. trade deficit with Canada was around US$35.7 billion in 2024. Daily trade flows averaged about US$2.5 billion, with Canada being the top export market for 34 U.S. states. Energy products, particularly crude oil, accounted for a significant portion of Canada’s exports (about 27% of merchandise exports), while vehicles and machinery were major U.S. exports. GROK ENDS

The crux of the story is pretty simple. Half of Canada's economy flows in by rail or pipe, or truck from the U.S., and not a small amount of that is our food. Even the petroleum energy used in eastern Canada flows in from Michigan.

And not just a trade war with the U.S.. Canada is being snubbed at every turn. EU signed the $750 Billion energy deal and there are other new arrangements with the $15 Trillion GDP EU economy. The overall agreement with the EU was $1.3 trillion to start, and already a repercussion for Canada, the EU reports there is no business case for Canadian aluminum and steel. Canada was reportedly told, "Your only market is the U.S.."

Is there any doubt about the problems Canada will face if these trends continue? And continue they do. Mexico is the latest to snub Canadians. Someday soon Canada will require new leadership and new government to go forward. (That was rather obvious until the Liberal switcheroo.)

NOW THIS, AN X POST ON THE MEXICO TRADE FIASCO

🚨🚨BREAKING - THE LASTEST BAD NEWS FOR CANADA

MEXICO'S SHEINBAUM CONFIRMS NO TRADE DEAL WITH CANADA

she makes it clear Carney visiting is not to strike a deal... "it is not necessary" pic.twitter.com/uZmIKbnVpS

— Tablesalt 🇨🇦 (@Tablesalt13) August 6, 2025

One victory for Canadians would be nice, even just one

 

It's a strange phenomenon to have a government standing in the way of well-being. But how strange, really? After all, people stand behind governments doing the strangest things. Take war. People are sent by governments  to die, by the millions, to be shot, blown up, kill and or be killed.

People go right along with this. Some are super enthusiastic. My Grandfather joined the Medicine Hat 175 Battalion in 1916 and rose from Private to Captain before war's end. He was Captain of a Lewis gun machinegun squad. My Dad was on the bridge of the HMCS Uganda spotting kamikazes for Captain Mainguy and Commodore Pullen in the Battle of Okinawa in 1945. I asked my Dad in his later years, "Would you do it again?" "Oh Yes."

I don't quite understand his level of enthusiasm for all the killing. It was definitely an exercise devoted entirely to the business of blowing people up. Here's what AI describes for my Dad's wartime experience:

GROK says: 

 Your father’s experience as the “Bogeyman” on HMCS Uganda, especially that haunting moment of locking eyes with a kamikaze pilot, is a profound piece of history. We can dive back into it anytime—whether to explore more about his role, the Okinawa campaign, or the emotional weight of those memories. Just let me know when you’re ready, and we’ll pick up where we left off. Thank you for sharing such a meaningful part of his life. 

GROK ENDS

The long and short of it, 12,000 Allies died in that 70 day battle against 1,900 suicide pilots while 150,000 more Japanese died on Okinawa, soldiers and civilians. (For some reason, the Japanese fleet sat this one out.)

I try to imagine myself in the middle of a carnage of 12,000 dead on my side in 70 days. It's impossible. It's unthinkable. Then I consider what my Grandfather saw in World War One. And I ask Grok to fill in those blanks. 

Here's the core of GROK's response:

Battles Fought by your Grandfather's CEF machinegun Squad:

As you noted, “these are the guys who saw many of the battles.” Your grandfather’s Lewis gun squad, under his command as Captain, likely fought in: 

Vimy Ridge (April 9–12, 1917): The 31st Battalion helped capture the ridge, with Lewis guns suppressing German trenches. Casualties were high (10,600 Canadian killed/wounded), and his squad’s survival shows their grit.

Hill 70 (August 15–25, 1917): The 31st faced fierce counterattacks, with Lewis guns pivotal for holding captured ground. Losses were heavy (9,200 Canadian casualties).

Passchendaele (October–November 1917): The 31st endured mud and shellfire, with Lewis guns providing cover in brutal conditions (16,000 Canadian casualties).

Hundred Days Offensive (August–November 1918): The 31st fought at Amiens, Drocourt-Quéant, and Cambrai, breaking German lines. Lewis gun squads were key in mobile warfare, with your grandfather’s leadership ensuring their effectiveness. The CEF’s total losses were 45,000 in this campaign alone.

The photo, with your grandfather seated and the Lewis gun at his knees, likely captures a moment from this period, possibly late 1918, when his squad’s battle-hardened bond was forged through these trials.  

GROK ENDS

These were different times in Canada. The priorities were different. But one thing's for sure. All those Canadians my Grandfather and Father hung around with, wouldn't have given two seconds to these fucking nebbish cu#ts we have running the country today.

A warning to rulers

Liberals book of rules

Tamara Lich, by now famous for the strange trial over mischief in the nation's Capital, said she doesn't agree with Prime Minister Carney having the authority to join the circle of hate against Israel. 

Lich said, "No, he doesn’t. He has a minority government. An announcement of this magnitude, supposedly on behalf of Canadians, was not made after rigorous parliamentary debate or put to a vote," she wrote, on X, (@LichTamara), "Dictators behave this way."

@YoungGunsBreaks (as ever, anonymously) replies, "Yes, he does, you stupid windbag."

At this stage, I enter the fray.

Everything this Liberal Criminal Syndicate is doing falls outside the purview of Parliament. 

Defying our allies, devaluing the personal property of Canadians, annihilating the social capital of our mobility in this country, strangling our nation, this whole Liberal game is something dark, and criminal. It needs to be stopped by the people of this country.

The Liberals know the Bloc is ready to bring down the government. That's why this government by fiat is taking place. It couldn't happen in a democracy.

I dare say, the trial of Tamara Lich and Chris Barber could not take place in a democracy.

Why would the Bloc be willing to bring down the Liberal minority?  Because the Bloc doesn't wish to be tied to the undertakings of these Liberal crime lords.

Now, Liberal pandering to terrorist organizations and terrorist sympathizers is being done, again, far outside the principles of Parliamentary democracy. 

These Liberals, they don't actually give a damn about being government. They are the rulers. 

WARNING TO RULERS: Rulers who take power under false pretense and abuse the nation they are stealing, those rulers end up in prison or dead. That's history.

Blowback is a motherfucker for everybody

Why not try behaving properly?

Here is my beef with the way the world works. It can kick you to pieces. It can tear limbs off you. It can create conspiracies of enemies against you and it can seriously damage you. 

It can take you apart mentally, physically, spiritually. It can do this for consecutive years often using the same conspirators for decades. It can be done secretly so you don't know or even suspect you are a target. You would never believe the depth and proximity of the conspirators.

 Those situations are not unique. They repeat in various ways over time to people the world over. There is a power to it. A structure exists here. The curious thing about this is the lack of regard the conspirators have for the power of the target. 

The pride of conspirators prevents them seeing beyond their target. They focus on the target. What if, and just ballparking here, but what if something greater is involved? Why not? What if something greater is the power to survive these conspiracies? Ah ha.

I'm not religious and after watching it for so long inside and out I am anything but political. As far as I can tell, 338 Canadians get appointed to scoop the cream and shit the fat on the rest of us. It is a fucking mess. I think AI should govern and it's every man for himself.

There was never a time in Canadian history when this wasn't the land of opportunity. Suddenly a criminal elite and their bubble butt companions say we have it too good. I say, "Get the fuck out of the way and don't speak in public anymore."

The point about the 'world' of conspirators marshaled upon a target by the explicit instruction of a baseline 5%'r, a five percenter being a garden variety psychopath, those conspirators don't think originally. They think what they are told to think. And hard as it seems to believe, they do it to their own personal detriment. 

Yes, because they are not equipped to survive the repercussions of the target surviving. To be clear, targets are not supposed to survive. When targets survive it is called in CIA jargon, blowback. The one thing that fucks things up for those with psychopathic intentions is blowback. Being discovered for what they are doing.

How does Blowback work? Example:  Military Industrial Complex stands back for 80 days of slaughter in Kigali? The head of the U.N. supervising contingent winds up on a park bench in Montreal babbling drunk accusing world leaders of atrocities.  That's a single example of blowback.

This bug has something important to tell you

Elon Musk says defund the UN

 — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 3, 2025

You think you can stop people who declared the world over-populated, then began depopulating the earth? 

Declining birth rates? Out of nowhere, happening all of a sudden? Or is it human engineering leading us to extinction?

These are the facts. Birth rates in Canada at 1.4 children per woman are well below the 2.1 children per woman rate of replacement to keep the population from declining. This is a world-wide trend that has taken place in less than three decades when Al Gore and a few alarmists started making noises about an overpopulated Earth. 

It was the mantra of the WEF, WHO, and a phalanx of Globalist nihilists who decided to kill off the human race. Successfully too, according to statistics.

It's the one claim of success these people can make. They succeeded in making the human race disappear.

So, in reality, a disappearing human population is their success story.

The oligarchs and their toadies at Davos agreed: Wiping out the human race is the goal. And they succeeded, somehow, putting human population in irreversible reverse.

The glittering people who gathered around Jeffrey Epstein for decades to rape children decided there are too many people on the Earth, so  population is shrinking (without explanation) so fast, we'll be gone in three to five generations.

That's impressive. The worst humans, the least impressive, basest, most disgusting, terrifying, and disturbing humans, joined to destroy humans, and succeeded. 

Begs the question: How do you convince human beings to do something as drastic as to stop breeding?

That's practically impossible to imagine. Yet. It's on. And happening. 

In fact it's been happening for a while, and the biggest clue of a disaster in the making was the period from 2020 to 2022 when people were locked in their homes for two years around the whole world, and, believe it or not, BIRTH RATES DECLINED!

It's not a normal course of human behavior.  This happens by planning. You need to plan to stop breeding. 

So when @elonmusk tells you the urgency of the situation is real, and you ignore it, it's probably because you are mentally re-engineered to ignore the truth and run against instinct. The elite has made the human race suspend the instinct for survival.

Because this birth rate in retrograde has happened, the world will end up standing still as a result, and the migrations of people will end, because nations will prevent people from leaving.